Featured

The Benefit of Having a Real Estate Attorney Involved in the Closing Process

By: Ashley Hobson, Esq. Picture1

Buying or selling a home can be both a stressful and exciting time. Many individuals may have no idea what to expect as they are entering into this process for the first time. The closing process can be confusing or overwhelming since there are many moving parts and documents with unfamiliar legal terms and conditions.

Sapphire Title has attorneys on staff to oversee the entire closing process and handle whatever legal issues may arise during your transaction, many times without any additional fees. Having an attorney review title searches, lien searches, surveys and closing disclosures eliminates much of the risk for items being missed or overlooked. If an issue does arise, whether it be with a party to the transaction or on the title and lien searches, it can be resolved on site and monitored closely by our team. An additional benefit to having attorney oversight is that issues can be resolved through dispute resolution, mediation, or court action if necessary. Attorneys can handle legal matters through avenues that other individuals do not have access to. The ability to simultaneously resolve legal issues and clear title in order to close on time or with as little delay as possible is a huge benefit to agents and their clients.

Many agents admit that they are not equipped to handle legal matters or settle any disputes that can arise and come to us for assistance in resolving issues for their clients. We strive to be a positive and reliable resource for our Real Estate Agent clients- this is a professional relationship that we value. Individuals sometimes find that they have to deal with an unforeseen issue prior to closing.

While the closing process can be intimidating- it doesn’t have to be. You quite literally place all of your trust in your selected title company. With our trusted closing team and attorney oversight, we are happy to be your guide through this time.

Advertisements
Featured

FAQs

faq-463379_960_720

What is Title?

Title is the legal ownership to a piece of property. Title is also considered evidence of possession of a property.

What is escrow?

Simply put, escrow is a deposit of funds in an account held by a third-party to a transaction. Title companies or attorney offices are the major escrow account third-parties used in real estate transactions. All funds are deposited in escrow at a title company and then dispersed according to the escrow instructions. In a real estate sale, the escrow instructions are the HUD Settlement Statement or the Closing Disclosure Statement.

What are Recording Fees?

Recording Fees are county fees and taxes that are required on every sale. When a real estate property is sold, a Deed needs to be recorded. When a buyer purchases a property using a mortgage, then recording fees and taxes are also due to the county. Both the recording fees and taxes must be collected by Sapphire Title Company and then paid directly to the county.

What are E-Recording Fees?

E-Recording is shorthand for Electronic Recording. About 20 years ago, every title company needed to mail in the original deed to the county where the property lies for recording. The county would then mail it back to the title company, who would then forward the original “stamped” recorded deed to the owner. Since the technology boom, counties have become more tech-savvy and have allowed for e-recording. E-recording typically costs $5 per document to be recorded. The $5 fee is convenient to both sellers and buyers in the real estate sale because it cuts down the costs and time to mail the documents back and forth from the county.  A typical turn-around time for a “manual” or “mailed” recording ranges from 7 to 14 days. E-recording typically allows for the county to record within 24-72 hours.

Example Breakdown of Fees:

Recording fees are based off the number of pages in the recordable document. A special warranty deed is typically 2 or 3 pages and generally costs about $27.00 to record. The taxes (known as documentary state taxes) on the Deed are based off the amount the property was sold for. So, if the property was sold for $100,000.00, the taxes would be $700.00.  Taxes are determined by rounding up the sales price to the nearest hundred and multiplying that amount by $0.007 (or $7 for every $100). The same formula is used for mortgages. Typically mortgages range from 18-26 pages or about $150.00 to $225.00 to record. If the mortgage is for $100,000, the documentary stamp taxes would also be $700.00. One difference between mortgage and deed recordings is an additional tax known as intangible taxes. Intangible taxes are collected on every mortgage recording except credit union lender mortgagees or other exempt lender banks. Intangible taxes are determined by rounding up the loan dollar amount to the nearest hundred and multiplying that amount by $0.002 (or $2 for every $100).

The combination of the deed recording fees, the deed’s taxes, the mortgage’s recording fees, the mortgage’s documentary taxes, the mortgage’s intangible taxes (if not exempt), and the e-recording fees total the recording fees.

What are Intangible Taxes? What are Transfer Taxes?

Intangible taxes are imposed by the State of Florida on obligations for payment of money which are secured by mortgages or other liens, as defined by §199.133 Fla. Stat. It is a nonrecurring tax on the note or debt instrument.

Transfer taxes are commonly referred to as documentary stamp taxes in Florida. These are imposed by states, counties, and cities on the title of real property from one person to another within that jurisdiction. Transfer taxes are often confusing to first time homebuyers because they are a combination of a few taxes.

Why do I need a Survey?

Surveys are always suggested and are used to determine if there are any encroachments on the property you own or wish to purchase. A survey details the structures (otherwise known as the improvements) and the boundaries of the property. Generally, on real estate sales involving a lender, the lender will require the Alta Form 9 insurance endorsement. If the lender requires the title company to issue this endorsement, then a survey will be required. Note, however, in most cases, a survey is good for 7-10 years and can be recertified and is often a much less expensive option than ordering a new survey, which can add between $300 and $500 to your closing costs.

Featured

Property Owners Rejoice: Major Estoppel Win Against Associations

June 15, 2017

A three-year legal battle came to an end on April 28th, when HB483, estoppel reform legislation, cleared its final legislative hurdle. An estoppel certificate or letter is required on each real estate closing involving a homeowner’s or condominium association and is intended to provide a full breakdown of expected and delinquent dues or assessments, special assessments, late fees, and violations.estoppel letter

As of yesterday, June 14, 2017, when Governor Rick Scott signed this into law, property owners with homeowners or condominium associations now can rest easy with mandatory caps on estoppel costs. In the past, associations were charging hundreds of dollars for estoppels which hiked up loan amounts, closing costs, and frustrations with everyone involved in the closing. In addition, title companies, realtors, brokers, closing agents, and mortgage brokers can now provide more accurate quotes to their customers.

The law goes into effect on July 1st and requires estoppel certificates to be provided within 10 days of the initial request and be valid for a minimum of 30 days. For owners who are current on their dues, the estoppel fee cap is $250. For owners who are delinquent on their dues, an additional fee of $150 can be charged. For rush estoppels, the fee cap is $100 for rush deliveries within 3 days.

For an example Estoppel Certification, please see Sapphire Title & Escrow’s Guidelines

Our Staff Goes Above and Beyond in Philanthropy

school drive 3For the month of July, the staff  held a Back to School drive for St. Peter Claver Elementary School.  The staff brought in items from toddler clothes to backpacks filled with glue, paper, crayons, pencils, pens, folders, hand soap, markers, and much more.  Each of the fifty backpacks were filled with the donated items along with an inspirational note.  We even had donations left over to give to the teachers to help replenish their stock throughout the year.  The staff was rewarded for their donations with an ice cream social.

school drive 2

 

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS RULES ON HOA ISSUE

By Jennifer Lima-Smith, Esquire

Partner, Gilbert Garcia Group, P.A.

The Second District Court of Appeals issued a decision on September 2, 2016 in the case of Ballantrae Homeowners Association v. Federal National Mortgage Association (2D15-1025 and 2D15-1026). The case involves a consolidated appeal from final summary judgments entered by the trial court in favor of Federal National Mortgage Association otherwise known as “Fannie Mae.” The District Court of Appeal reversed the trial court’s decision granting summary judgment in favor of Fannie Mae.picture3

 

The background facts indicate there are two properties governed by the Associations Declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions. Each property was encumbered by a recorded first mortgage and also by the homeowner’s association lien for unpaid assessments. The borrowers on both properties defaulted on their mortgages. The servicers of the loans initiated foreclosure proceedings. Neither foreclosure case included the HOA as a party to the action as a defendant. Final judgments were entered in favor of Fannie Mae and were sold to Fannie Mae. Subsequently, an estoppel of the assessments due was sought by Fannie Mae. The amounts due to the association was challenged. Fannie Mae requested a declaratory and injunctive relief on the amounts due and stated their responsibility was limited to the assessments accrued after it acquired title to the properties. The trial court examined the Declarations and concluded Fannie Mae was only liable for the unpaid assessments after it acquired title and the HOA was ordered to provide an estoppel letter reflecting the reduction.

The appellate court distinguished other appellate case decisions and examined the language of the Declarations. The appellate court determined the Declaration’s subordination verbiage contained provisions to subordinating the assessment lien to the 1st mortgage but it did not contain wording specifically limiting or eliminating the subsequent owner’s liability for unpaid assessments. The reviewing court examined the law and found that it is well established under common law, the foreclosure of a senior mortgage extinguishes that of a junior mortgage listed in the final judgment. However, it is also well established that where a junior lienholder is not made a party to the foreclosure brought by the senior mortgage holder, “the lien of the junior mortgagee is unaffected by the judgment.” Abdoney v. York, 903 So.2d 981, 983 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005); See also, Willoughby Estates v. Bankunited, No. 2014AP000015, 2015 WL 5472506 at *2 (Fla. 15th Cir. Ct. June 23, 2015). At foreclosure therefore, the association’s lien rights were not adjudicated and the assessments liens remained intact. The appellate court concluded, the sale was held and the junior lienholders had no opportunity to bid or stir up others to benefit from a surplus.

The court stated the only remedies available to Fannie Mae are to move to compel redemption or filing a new action to re-foreclose. The association can defend itself in the same manner as if the foreclosure never happened. The court also stated that Fannie Mae’s actions for declaratory and injunctive relief are not recognized methods for removing the lien of an omitted junior lienor.

It is always a good idea to consult with your foreclosure and real estate counsel if there are any questions.